Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Tree of Gondor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Gondor which has a full paragraph on this fictional element. – sgeureka t•c 14:29, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

White Tree of Gondor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The symbol is not unknown, it has inspired some secondary fictional works, etc., but I can't find any sources suggesting it has been analyzed or studied otherwise. As it is, fails WP:GNG/NFICITON/pure PLOT. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:26, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  08:26, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:28, 13 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete There is not enough 3rd party analysis to justify a stand alone article on this subject.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:24, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Uproot the tree.--Jack Upland (talk) 07:24, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Gondor The White Tree of Gondor has no notability outside of its use as a symbol by a fictional state. &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 21:40, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge to Gondor. As usual, deletion of information which can be merged elsewhere benefits nobody. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:52, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Gondor. Its covered sufficiently there already, and could be used as a redirect as a plausible search term.  As its already covered in the target article, and there is no information here using any sort of citations from reliable, secondary sources, merging isn't necessary.  As a side note, am I the only one that got a chuckle out of the fact that there is a genealogy chart for the tree's "family"? Rorshacma (talk) 16:51, 16 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.