Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Weenie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirect to Aggro deck. — Mets 501 (talk) 14:37, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

White Weenie
Individual Magic decktypes not notable for inclusion, even successful ones. See precedents:
 * Articles_for_deletion/U/G_Madness
 * Articles_for_deletion/Sligh
 * Articles_for_deletion/Ravager Affinity Andrew Levine 12:46, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Why delete this?
 * Delete per nom. Andrew Levine 12:46, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Please stop posting delete per nom in your own nominations, it's extraordinarily bad form. WilyD 13:34, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, at one time this was a somewhat common practice; I'm not not aware of any guideline or policy that it is against...--Isotope23 16:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * This is true. I've been reflexively posting that for a long time, since back when the process was still "Votes for Deletion." Whether it's against current policy or not, though, if I stop now it will save me time. Andrew Levine 08:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Aggro deck it's already covered there, merge if desired. WilyD 13:34, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect, per WilyD.--Isotope23 16:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect per WilyD. It's a notable deck, but it doesn't need its own article. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 06:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.