Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White allies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Anti-racism. Jenks24 (talk) 14:50, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

White allies

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am nominating this page for deletion for a number of reasons. The article fails to meet numerous Wikipedia criteria, including but not limited to lacking POV neutrality, having little to no substance, and be only marginally verifiable.  Ergo Sum  07:07, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 12:16, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 09:20, 22 May 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * leaning delete I'm having a hard time seeing this getting anywhere beyond what is essentially a dictionary definition with a dollop of POV issues. There's probably an article out there somewhere, maybe several articles, about white participation in these movements, but this seems unlikely ever to be that article. Mangoe (talk) 22:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:56, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 29.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 08:25, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. While this is a poor stub with neutrality issues, those are taggable issues. I don't think this is bad enough to be WP:TNTed. And crucially, the term seems to be used in academic works, even in the titles of some: ,,, and . I couldn't quickly find a definition, but I think there's enough to show this is likely notable. A sociologist of race would be good to consult on this, and that's a very popular subtype of sociologist in the US. I suggest pinging WT:SOCIO, it has 2-3 active members besides me, and maybe one of them is familiar with that field? (I am a sociologist of social movements and collective intelligence, so not my subfield). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:53, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete There are actually thousands of "white" Americans who actively oppose racism and/or try to help people of other races. I feel the topic is too vague and artificially constructed for a WP article. Also the title does not seem right since it defines them relative to other people. Kitfoxxe (talk) 14:15, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Anti-racism. I've just written a new short section in the anti-racism article, meant to replace this. This is a large and important topic, and not well-represented elsewhere on Wikipedia. It would be better served as part of the anti-racism article, as it certainly hasn't done well in its ten-year history in this one... I didn't use any of the existing material. I suggest WP:BLANKANDREDIRECT in order to WP:PRESERVE the edit history and bibliography for possible future use. I'll volunteer to do that, after this discussion closes. Note to the nominator and delete proponents: you could have done this yourself as per WP:SOFIXIT, instead of just dumping it in Articles for Deletion. -- IamNotU (talk) 19:00, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Good idea.Kitfoxxe (talk) 15:01, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I have no objection to redirect, through the concept is probably notable enough it will eventually be recreated. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:00, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If so it should have a better title. "White allies" could just as well be Japan's white allies in WWII, Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. Kitfoxxe (talk) 14:57, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Hopefully it will be expanded enough in the anti-racism article so that it can be split out again sometime in the future. If someone can think of a better title, that would be fine. Thanks... -- IamNotU (talk) 15:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:58, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect - Notable topic, but if it's already covered/merged into Anti-racism (which has more content than this article), that makes sense to me. No objection whatsoever to recreation as that section develops. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 12:45, 8 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.