Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White tuna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. —— Eagle (ask me for help) 19:31, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

White tuna


Fails WP:V. -Nv8200p talk 18:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, no it doesn't. -Amarkov blahedits 18:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Smerge and redirect to Sushi. Otto4711 18:57, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Certainly meets WP:V (I see two good references already), and there's plenty of precedent for articles on specific types of sushi. | Mr. Darcy talk 20:17, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The second reference is to a post on a foodie message board. Not a good reference. Otto4711 20:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- Windows33 22:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Well now, this is an interesting one. There are certainly lots of fine references, but there may not be many in English. Since I'm not able to find a good discussion of different grades of fish in any of our articles, I think this article deserves a pass. What are really missing are the accompanying articles on other grades of "tuna". At some point in the future, this might be a candidate to be merged with those other grades, but as for now, this is a keep. Dekimasu 02:19, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets WP:V and doesn't fit well with a merge to either tuna or sushi. B.Wind 03:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Japanese Wikipedia says bin-naga maguro(ビンナガマグロ) is Albacore. Black marlin is called shiro kajiki(シロカジキ). Japanese eat them as sushi and sashimi. But sushi restaurants doesn't sell escolar in Japan. Helgo 15:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.