Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitebeak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy deleted as A7.  Jamie ☆ S93  19:54, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Whitebeak

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod; fails WP:BAND. ~EdGl  &#9733;  16:23, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- kelapstick (talk) 17:04, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * delete my search brings up nothing band related. Why couldn't this be speedied?  "Moderate local success" and 50 copies of their albums sold world wide is not an indication of significance or importance in my eyes.  --kelapstick (talk) 17:10, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - I've tagged it db-band. No assertion of notability. - SummerPhD (talk) 18:14, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. 50 Copies!? Ouch. Hairhorn (talk) 18:24, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete--sorry, I forgot that I'm not notable either. Keep since that's 49 more than I sold of my mixtape. Drmies (talk) 19:35, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.