Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitehall Interiors NYC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Goldstein, Hill & West Architects. WP:SNOW. Anyone who thinks this close is inappropriate may revert it. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 04:23, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Whitehall Interiors NYC

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This has been deleted and restored several times, so I think it advisable to get a community decision. My own opinion is that it is not sufficiently distinct from the parent company to have a separate article, as shown by the fact hat almost all the coverage of their work ascribes the work to the architectural firm, not to them.  DGG ( talk ) 04:15, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Goldstein, Hill & West Architects. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  04:37, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Goldstein, Hill & West Architects BMK (talk) 04:50, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 9 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Goldstein, Hill & West Architects. – Davey 2010 Talk 17:26, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above - a sample source shows that one broader article will be more appropriate than two shallower ones. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  18:16, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect, yes. --IJBall (talk) 19:45, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect and merge to Goldstein, Hill & West Architects. Epic Genius (talk) 03:09, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.