Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitehall Time Travel Therory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:24, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Whitehall Time Travel Therory

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested PROD by page's creator. Non-notable theory, only source is self-published. Fails WP:V, WP:NFT, possibly WP:COI. DMacks (talk) 17:20, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, clearly. Zero coverage anywhere else other than here, funnily enough. It almost qualifies as WP:HOAX. And please send this "physics student" off for some spelling lessons while we're at it .... --Nickhh (talk) 18:52, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete no source for notability, original research, etc...--Boffob (talk) 18:58, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Time travel is possible and has been proven and demonsrated, just not in the way suggested in this unsourced essay. This is not the place to publish original research. Duffbeerforme (talk) 19:30, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * rereading it this is sort of almost the real example of time travel (sorry was too eager to dismiss this bullshit as bullshit) but it is not, as suggested, an original idea from Whitehall, just based on the demonostrated example of a shown example of time travel already demonstrated. The main real difference is the "wormhole" which I see no support for. Unsourced original research.Duffbeerforme (talk) 20:00, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Entirely non-notable.  WP:MADEUP clearly applies here.  Plus, the title made me think it was some kind of conspiracy theory involving Whitehall and time travel.  It just couldn't live up to that. JulesH (talk) 22:06, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: I was rather disappointed about that as well. --Nickhh (talk) 09:28, 6 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable. Edward321 (talk) 01:59, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete "due to lack of funding and the inability to create wormholes." Errr, seriously, this is a prime case of WP:MADEUP. gnfnrf (talk) 05:11, 6 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.