Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whiteowl Drop That


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:53, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Whiteowl Drop That

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article was prodded previously for failing WP:MUSIC by being a non-notable mix tape. The PROD was later removed. I agree with the original PROD, and believe that this is still the case. Rockfang (talk) 16:35, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Mixtapes generally aren't notable, and I see nothing that makes this one notable. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:54, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as NN. We66er (talk) 17:55, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 11:22, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, as article doesn't even attempt to establish notability. Should have been speedy deleted in the first place. Darimoma (talk) 02:02, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It couldn't have been speedied. None of the general criteria seem to apply.  The only article criteria that seems to come close, is A7, but that "...applies only to articles about web content or articles on people and organizations themselves, not articles on their books, albums, software and so on."--Rockfang (talk) 02:09, 17 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.