Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitosphere


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 17:12, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Whitosphere

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable neologism. nneonneo talk 20:44, 6 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable nonsense. Ironholds (talk) 20:46, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Francis Holland promoting his own blog. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 22:22, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete db-copyvio JuJube (talk) 01:45, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Author claims that it's his own quote, so it's not a blatant copyvio (it could still be copyvio if he doesn't provide sufficient proof that it is his own blog, etc.). nneonneo talk 15:54, 7 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete nonsense Czolgolz (talk) 15:22, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete copyvio. The original blog has copyright, and he hasn't released it for inclusion in Wikipedia. Even so, article should be deleted as the term was coined by Holland himself. B.Wind (talk) 06:04, 11 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.