Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Who's Now


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 09:58, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Who's Now
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not particularly notable recurrent segment of ESPN's SportsCenter from a little over two years ago, which was widely derided as insignificant. As for the article, its only sources are dead links, and has been tagged as being of questionable notability for over a year. Someone apparently suggested merge to SportsCenter, but the proper target article is actually List of SportsCenter segments and specials, where suitable content is already present. I don't think the title is a useful redirect any more than The Greatest Highlight with Chris Berman, TitleTown USA (this one redirects to a dab page), Mt Rushmore of Sports, Fan Feast, or 30th Anniversary SportsCenter would be, so just delete. Alex finds herself awake at night ( Talk ·  What keeps her up ) 04:20, 5 October 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable ratings gimmick only designed to get ratings numbers, website hits and well...mentions in articles like this which make it sound bigger than it actually was.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 23:15, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:21, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per nom. Clearly non-notable ratings gimmick. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:33, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Mrschimpf's solid arguments; no sources, inflated "notability" at best. Clearly nobody cares about it, since the afd has been relisted twice. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:54, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.