Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Who's Who in Gold and Silver


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 16:01, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Who's Who in Gold and Silver

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This web site does not meet notability. There is no independent coverage about it. I did consider merging this with Worshipful Company of Goldsmiths. I decided against this because this is just a database of designers. We don't normally enumerate all the web content for some company. Whpq (talk) 14:27, 3 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. The site does not inherit notability from the guild. Wouldn't object to a redirect, although I don't know how useful it would be. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 20:13, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - There is no mention at all of this directory at the guild article so a simple redirect would leave the reader wondering why they've been sent there. -- Whpq (talk) 20:57, 3 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment. I thought from the title that this was a cast listing for Pawn Stars. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:25, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:44, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:44, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:44, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:44, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete – Source searches are not providing coverage to satisfy WP:WEBCRIT. I have added an external link to the webpage at the Worshipful Company of Goldsmiths article, which should suffice. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 09:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.