Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Who, What, Wear


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:50, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Who, What, Wear

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable online magazine lacking non-trivial support. Fails WP:WEB. red dog six (talk) 15:59, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  16:35, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  16:35, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - passes WP:WEB per coverage in Glamour (linked in article), Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age, Women's Wear Daily, and the multitude of other sources available via Google search. Suggest the nominator review WP:BEFORE. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:37, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Given Nikki's sources I think it now passes the GNG bar.LM2000 (talk) 08:15, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Well sourced, notable, don't see a reason for deletion. Adamh4 (talk) 21:36, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.