Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Who Gets the Dog? (2007 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Who Gets the Dog? (2007 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Deprodded with addition of a review, but I could find no other sources. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:10, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I added the Guardian review. As it was screened primetime on the most popular tv station in the UK it is highly likely it was reviewed in a number of newspapers such as The Times, and Telegraph and others. Unfortunately those newspapers are paywalled. Could someone with access to Newpapers.com search for the search term Who gets the dog ? Kevin Whately. Just to note the Commonsense media review is for a different film of the same name, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:24, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I found only TV Guide listings. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Maybe its on ProQuest? Atlantic306 (talk) 23:32, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * There is what looks like a reasonably lengthy article about the film in The Stage as shown previewed here 7th down but I don't have access, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep. I've found quite a few reviews for this, as well as some production info. I can't find the viewership numbers, as those seem to be hidden behind further paywalls that I can't access. In any case, the reviews for this are kind of hilarious in that it was almost universally reviled by the press, who were a bit more candid than they otherwise would have been. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  12:42, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep changing to full keep in light of the extra reviews found and added to the article such as The Telegraph and The Independent to go with The Guardian and others so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:25, 29 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.