Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Who Wants to Be a Millionaire (soundtrack)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 22:25, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Who Wants to Be a Millionaire (soundtrack)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Deprodded with addition of directory listings from Discogs and Amazon, plus a link to a website of dubious reliability. Album does not seem to be notable per WP:NALBUMS. It never charted and wasn't reviewed. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:17, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep I appreciate that this album is a little unusual to say the least however it is an album which DOES exist albeit quite rare and the links provided support this. It is the soundtrack album of a programme which is very much memorable and as such, the album should be notable too.  It may not have charted nor been popular but this does not change the fact that it does exist.  Cexycy (talk) 23:29, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete no doubt this MP3 download existed and no doubt WWTBAM is a notable TV programme, but neither of these facts make the download notable in any way. Without some sort of evidence of a reliable, independent review, or a chart position, the article should go. The WWTBAM article mentions the recording and that should be sufficient. Sionk (talk) 23:50, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * So are you suggesting an article merge then? Cexycy (talk) 12:54, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Hasn't charted and I can't find any decent refs. Doctorhawkes (talk) 01:48, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge - notability ain't inherited, and while this does not appear to be notable on its own, it also seems both short enough and sourced enough that adding it to the main article on the show would probably remain relevant enough.  — Isarra ༆ 20:39, 7 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 10 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge Not notable in itself, could be mentioned in main article on show (not sure we need to keep the track listing, though). --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:06, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I think a merge would be okay if we KEEP the track listing. It's all good information.  Same for the single too.  Cexycy (talk) 03:33, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I'd be against keeping the tracklist. In the bigger picture of the show the tracklist of a minor download album is trivial. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:56, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree; the track listing itself seems irrelevant to the show.  — Isarra ༆ 20:08, 16 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - As already stated, while the show itself is notable, that notability is not inherited, and this soundtrack really has nothing to show that it has any sort of independent notability of its own. The few references that are provided do nothing except show that this album exists, and that really doesn't count towards having the multiple reliable third party sources needed to show any sort of signifigance.  I would suggest merging, but there really isn't that much information here actually worth saving that would be especially relevant to the gameshow's main article.  Rorshacma (talk) 18:04, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.