Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Who the F**k Is Justin Bieber


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus here seems to be that this does not meet NSONG and no viable redirect target currently exists. ST47 (talk) 14:03, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Who the F**k Is Justin Bieber

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Funny track, but no actual evidence of notability. One week at #31 in one chart, and that was it. The link to the band name is a redirect back here. Guy (help!) 22:26, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - Actually it is not just the song itself and its brief charting history, but what preceded it in a highly viral interview by Ozzy Osbourne sampled prominently in the video. Also its prominent use in other media resulting for example in a major launch of the 6G series that refers to Who the F**k Is Justin Bieber.  So it is not just a charting history that we are looking at. Plus that the article is adequately referenced. werldwayd (talk) 22:32, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Which is why the article is full of reliable sources that say that. Oh, it isn't. No it's not adequately referenced. Guy (help!) 23:00, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:51, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:52, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Being in official Danish chart is probably NSONG, but the key test of GNG seems missing for the Song (and not just RS of where the Song title came from)
 * Delete - Back in 2013 someone took the odd step of redirecting the artist (Charleston Clubbers) to this song article. I can find practically no information about them except for the usual social media and retail sites. As for this song, the sources that are currently in the article, and most of the media events mentioned by the previous voter, are about the light-hearted Osbourne/Bieber "feud" and are not about this song. The song itself only shows up in the usual social media and retail sites as well, plus some occasional mentions of its fortunate connection to celebrities. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 14:26, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Britishfinance (talk) 02:45, 7 November 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - Charting in Denmark gives it the presumption of notability per WP:NSONG, but to sustain that presumption we'd be looking for multiple independent reliable sources discussing the song, and I really couldn't find anything at all in my WP:BEFORE. Like, nothing actually discussing the song rather than the Osbourne/Bieber feud. At all. FOARP (talk) 13:20, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NSONG. Normally I would say redirect this to a page on the artist due to lack of sourcing, but in the absence of a viable redirect keep is the best option. The song charted so it's notable. Any content not reliably cited should be removed. If it's a stub, it is a stub.4meter4 (talk) 17:55, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lord Roem ~ (talk) 04:14, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete — I disagree that this article fulfills WP:NSONG. A majority, if not all, of the sources provided consist of chart listings or social media posts; they are not mentions by a third party source (e.g. news, magazine) and do not support any claim of notability. I also do not think the "context equates to prominence" argument has any merit as through that argument any parody or political song could have an article on Wikipedia, which is not what Wikipedia is for. Centre Left Right  ✉ 05:10, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above discussion and since there does not appear to be an appropriate article for a redirect. Aoba47 (talk) 17:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and create the appropriate article that would include it. DeloreanTimeMachine (talk) 18:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I am uncertain if the main artist (Charleston Clubbers) has enough coverage for an article. Aoba47 (talk) 22:49, 19 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.