Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wholetones


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 08:39, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Wholetones

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable.  scope_creep Talk  23:59, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:13, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:13, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Try and get some clarity over the Billboard Rankings reference
 * tending Delete - Review of the sources shows lack of independent notability. This looks good on the face of it, until you find that the listing itself is not peer-reviewed, and there are no published or reviewed results available. This is a promotional write-up by the originator. This is not a review, but a lavender-scented gush of enthusiasms. - However, not sure what to think about the Billboard rankings. #1 rankings do tend to come with some claim to notability, even if it's meant for dogs... -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:27, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep per billboard reference but its no longer showing Georgiamarlins (talk) 20:12, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Britishfinance (talk) 17:52, 24 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.