Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whorld


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. &mdash; Scientizzle 17:35, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Whorld

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This software does not seem to have been the subject of any independent articles or reviews. No assertions or proof of notability. Borderline spam. Delete TheRingess (talk) 17:11, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * comment: I was the original author of this article, and I do not, in any way, have any association with this software or its programmer Chris Korda. I haven't been on Wikipedia for long, so I do not know if the notability rules have been changed or not. I will leave this for the community to decide whether it merits deletion. WooyiTalk to me? 18:57, 25 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. The charge of spamming is quickly dismissed on the grounds that the wording used to describe the creator of this software is not too kind, but the article gives me the impression that the purpose for which the software was made is by itself non-notable, and more so the software itself. --Blanchardb- Me  MyEarsMyMouth-timed 22:34, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of reliable sources. --Tikiwont 09:55, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.