Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Why I Left Jihad: The Root of Terrorism and the Return of Radical Islam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus to delete. Merging may be done as an editorial action, but valid concerns are raised, so I'll leave it up to ordinary editing. Mango juice talk 17:06, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Why I Left Jihad: The Root of Terrorism and the Return of Radical Islam
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not enough sources to write an article? SolarBreeze 19:14, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 
 * Comment I fixed the link for you. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 20:00, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep While a lot of the coverage seems biased, there seems to be enough coverage to satisfy me that it's notable, particularly to the evangelical right    for example. I'd weakly support a merge to Walid Shoebat, but feel that would make his article horribly lopsided (with a long section on one of his books and nothing on the others) —   iride scent   (talk to me!)  21:26, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge People can always add information on his other books - that's not a problem. And this entry can be edited down if necessary when moved. The book certainly has blog hype that are independent of the author, if not exactly unbiased. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkinBoston (talk • contribs) 21:53, August 25, 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability not demonstrated. --Coppertwig 23:35, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for fixing the link sorry about that SolarBreeze 21:55, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge with author. The article is too short to survive, and the book is perhpas not notable enough to warrant a full article.  Peterkingiron 11:31, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 17:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per Coppertwig. Zain 01:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge Although I apreciate that skews off his article a bit, I feel that the book has some notability to it, but not enough to have an entire article. However, the content should go somewhere, with sources, and therefore we will just have to allow others knowledgable/interested in the subject to add the relevant information to balance out the article again. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 21:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 08:16, 9 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.