Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Why Rummel is always right


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 15:27, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Why Rummel is always right
Another result of an ongoing edit war between User:Pmanderson and User:Ultramarine. See Articles for deletion/Why other peace theories are wrong for more. Delete Robdurbar 19:39, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Does not belong in article space, but Move to user space. See comments at other AfD; this contains claims, which I believe false, but which do not appear elsewhere in article space. It will be useful for future editors of R. J. Rummel Septentrionalis 22:45, 21 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and with reference to the other article. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px| ]] AfD? 23:06, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN this inherent POV. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 23:24, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:POINT among other things. Blatant POV. Stifle 00:41, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment please note article was originally titled Democratic peace theory (Specific historic examples) and renamed by Pmanderson|Septentrionalis to give it a POV name and lead to its deletion. --Salix alba (talk) 14:25, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I oppose its deletion, as above. But I do believe the present name descriptive of its contents. Septentrionalis 00:56, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, POV. incog 18:50, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Do not bother to salvage its contents; the present name is indeed descriptive of the contents. 172 11:22, 25 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.