Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Why the Innocent Die Young


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nakon 01:18, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Why the Innocent Die Young

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No coverage in reliable sources to verify or sustain an article. Fails general notability and WP:NALBUMS. Jbh (talk) 13:45, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:03, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:03, 5 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep This is a covered, notable album by Dethcentrik. Please look out for this AfD's results as well. --BusyWikipedian (talk) 15:15, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note - — BusyWikipedian (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. } Jbh (talk) 15:33, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Please check my contributions before making such statements -BusyWikipedian (talk) 15:27, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry, when I looked at your contributions all I saw were edits related to Død Beverte who is a member of Dethcentrik and Død Incarnate Records including the Deathcentric albums which are not even remotly near passing WP:NALBUM. I should have looked deeper. Striking SPA and will do so at the other AfDs related to Deathcentric. Jbh (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - I see two reviews from reliable sources in the article. —Torchiest talkedits 20:44, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment To be specific WP:NALBUMS requires significant non-trivial coverage in RS. Having the album chart on a national chart (in the US that is one based on Nielson's Soundscan), be nominated for a major award (ie Grammy or equivalent). Metal Stoem is a blog not RS. The Gauntlet is not RS and is simply providing access to a Youtube banned video and Rockfreaks is also a blog and not RS. Jbh (talk) 22:04, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: Staff reviews after 2008 from Metal Storm are considered reliable, per WP:ALBUM/SOURCES (a post-2008 staff review is being cited in that article). Also, Rockfreaks was discussed in the talk page there recently, and the consensus seemed to be that's reliable too. So, I voted keep, per those two reviews. Kokoro20 (talk) 16:57, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.