Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Why you need an ISO Standard facility for Drive rebuilds


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete: early closing per WP:SNOWBALL -- The Anome (talk) 11:27, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Why you need an ISO Standard facility for Drive rebuilds

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Fails WP:SOAP and WP:NOT. Delete. --Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 17:31, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 18:00, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's not "log in and type whatever comes to mind" either. WillOakland (talk) 18:34, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * You mean WP:NOT, right? Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 20:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and as WP:OR. Ros0709 (talk) 18:40, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced original research, how-to content, need I go on? Beeblbrox (talk) 22:48, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Beeblbrox. -- The Anome (talk) 22:57, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * the forecast calls for WP:SNOW Beeblbrox (talk) 23:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete snow JuJube (talk) 07:45, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.