Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whzan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 20:26, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Whzan

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notabiliy is not established by third-party reliable sources Novangelis (talk) 05:49, 30 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Google searches revealed no significant independent coverage. Seems promotional. Last of all, the subject cannot be positively identified. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 06:38, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

* delete No news coverage, no significant third-party coverage.  Heywoodg 07:52, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 30 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article is about an open, internet cloud based service for the connection and monitoring of remote and dynamic devices. With the online tools users can create applications share live data with communities.  Well, isn't that specific?  Content is exclusively promotional.  - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:36, 30 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - insufficient 3rd party sources to establish notability; created by an SPA as probably promotional. Dialectric (talk) 00:33, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. GNews shows three results: two for other uses of the word, one to the company website. Not notable and WP is not a promotional tool. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 13:03, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Whzan has linked to the NHS Florance System — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.43.160.190 (talk) 23:39, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * It's actually "NHS Florence System", apparently. I appreciate the heads-up, as plus Whzan plus "NHS Florance System" does turn up hits. They are pretty much small mentions or side notes on blogs for NHS and similar sites, but at least they indicate that Whzan is not as bad a subject as I first thought. They could be the kernel of future notability, but still don't think it's there yet. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 00:17, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.