Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wi-Fi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy keep.  Sango  123   20:35, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Wi-Fi
How many internet-related articles are we going to have? Not this one, at least. --XSSX 20:19, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Nominator's contributions consist solely of vandalism plus this afd nom. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:35, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep It's hard to assume good faith with this nomination. Wi-Fi is an extremely widely-used term, recieving 141,000,000 Google results and used in names such as the Nintendo Wi-Fi Connection. - Kookykman| (t) e
 * Speedy keep For obvious reasons. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:32, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Bad faith nom I think. --Charlesknight 20:34, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Strong Keep. I am doing my very best to assume good faith, but I find it extremely hard to believe that this article is without merit. The basis for the nomination provides no reason why this article fails to meet any of the criteria or policies of Wikipedia. Just because there are a lot of internet-related articles is no reason to choose one for deletion. To accept that is to say we should delete Mississippi River because there are a lot of articles here about rivers. (I note the only other edits by this user were reverted as vandalism.) Agent 86 20:34, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep notable topic -- Where is Where? 21:06, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.