Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WiRED International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 22:08, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

WiRED International

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced, and the sources I can see don’t support notability. Mccapra (talk) 20:57, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:16, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:16, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:16, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:16, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:17, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:17, 19 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - Per nom. This is just cringe. Seeing the manually resurrected 'mission statement' infobox parameter almost gave me an heart attack. The creator Fogcellist and major contributor Cspirito seemed to be single-purpose on promoting the subject with no other edits. Maybe indef those as well? Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 22:29, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nomination. The page seems to be an SPA pet project. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 22:53, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Per the nominator. I agree that this page seems to be an SPA pet project. It was created and built up almost entirely by two single-purpose accounts, but I'm not sure it is worth sanctioning those editors as Fogcellist hasn't edited in 10 years and Cspirito in four. I guess it is up to the closing admin to decide whether to pursue indefing them, as I don't really know anything about SPA sanctions. but it probably would be good to deal with them now just in case they ever decide to return. Newshunter12 (talk) 11:41, 26 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.