Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wible Orchard, California


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Wible Orchard, California

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A particularly egregious case of synthesis in the GNIS compilation, as, according to the maps which are the supposed source, "Wible" and "Wible Orchards" were at two different locations, and the current label is at neither of these. "Wible" is the rail location, and it's the usual passing siding and presumably station with no obvious town around it. At some point a complex of factory-ish buildings got erected a short ways to the NE, and on these maps, Wible goes away and the complex is labelled "Wible Orchards". I can't tell exactly when these buildings were replaced by huge grocery store now occupying the location. but at any rate the GNIS compilers decided to move the label another block north. So we have three separate spots: a NN rail spot, a literal fruit processing plant, and a location that nobody but GNIS apparently ever called "Wible" anything. I see no reason to keep this. Mangoe (talk) 15:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:04, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:04, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:06, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
 * At worst redirect to Kern County. – Cupper 52 Discuss! 12:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment – This appears to be a neighborhood in the city of Bakersfield, California. It has a lot of references online - especially in the local news and in on real estate related sites. Jooojay (talk) 12:50, 30 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Following WP:NGEO, if place is not legally recognized (e.g. incorporated town), and does not have significant coverage in RS, then it is not notable enough for an article. LK (talk) 04:28, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.