Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiccan goddesses


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 05:39, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Wiccan goddesses

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

First of all this page looks to me as an essay. Second, I don't see what it adds. It treats four ancient Greek goddesses with their own article. So, what is it? A mere repetition? I hope I am wrong but IMO this "article" has nothing to do with an encyclopedic article. Yannismarou 18:25, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:00, 26 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Totally unencyclopaedic, no attempt to write this article from a NPOV. Fails WP:NOR and WP:RS. We already have the valid info elsewhere. --Folantin 12:53, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is just an original research Wiccan essay that puts forth a reinterpretation of already documented Greek mythological figures. NeoFreak 13:27, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the content, but it is not the correct place for it. Slavlin 14:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: No doubt this might have a place on the FuzzyNewAgePedia, but here, it blows holes through WP:NOR, never mind WP:BOLLOCKS.  RGTraynor 18:08, 26 March 2007 (UTC)


 * This article serves no purpose that couldn't be served by a category for the named goddesses, all of whom have articles of their own. Check to make sure nothing on the specific goddesses is new, move to the right page is so, then delete. Alba 18:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - essay, fails WP:NOR. Moreschi Request a recording? 19:57, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral as this could be a good article, given a complete overhaul. Goddesses are a BIG part of Wicca, and they are not interpreted in the same way as they are in mythology. Feel free to drop a note on my talk page if said overhaul occurs.Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 03:43, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: ... which properly belongs in the Wicca article, or perhaps a Wiccan treatment of mythological deities article. RGTraynor 13:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.