Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wichai Sankhachandrananda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 02:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Wichai Sankhachandrananda

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Deprodded, so taking this to AfD. This is a rather flowery biography of a living person. Until recently, this biography used to be sourced to a "private interview", which violates WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH. The page creator said during the deprodding to have added sources, but these are merely homepage links of some instutions mentioned in the text. A Thai version was deleted from th-wiki for being a bio using primary sources. --HyperGaruda (talk) 21:02, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. HyperGaruda (talk) 21:02, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics-related deletion discussions. HyperGaruda (talk) 21:02, 1 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence of meeting WP:Prof or WP:GNG. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:46, 1 February 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete. Insufficiently notable. Seligne (talk) 02:51, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing genuinely matches Wiki standards. Jjimenez91 (talk)
 * Keep. More references now being added to this article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mongkolsak (talk • contribs) 08:26, 4 February 2017 (UTC)  — Mongkolsak (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete. Still essentially an unsourced personal memoir. No evidence of actual academic notability and very far from verifiability. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:09, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails both GNG and SNG standards. Lourdes  06:26, 8 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.