Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wicked Willow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 06:46, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Wicked Willow

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While doing a WP:BEFORE search, I could only find one review (The Guardian) by a reliable source. The sources currently used in the article (i.e. Teen-books.com, Shadowcat.name, and Litefoot1969.bravepages.com) do not appear to be reliable. Unfortunately, I do not think this trilogy of books meets the WP:GNG criteria for significant coverage from third-party, reliable sources. Aoba47 (talk) 08:48, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Aoba47 (talk) 08:50, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:42, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:19, 12 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete The one inline citation in the article is a non-independent website by the book's author. A Google test shows content mainly about the related TV show and no RIS apart from the one given by the nominator. Failing GNG, the books also don't meet WP:BK. Modussiccandi (talk) 17:33, 17 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.