Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Widerberg (musician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  07:11, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Widerberg (musician)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No clear indication of notability. Pepper Beast   (talk)  21:49, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:10, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:10, 5 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Abstain, see comment under. The only Turkish source I found about him is this and is nowhere near a major publisher . I found two small English sources in very sketchy websites, one of which triggers the filter. When you search his real name you get a middle school student that was lost 2 years ago. I looked at the Swedish page to find sources, but that page links to a disambiguation. Subject seems to not be notable, unless someone can find more sources.  ~Styyx   Talk? ^-^  16:30, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: there's absolutely nothing here that would pass the criteria at WP:MUSICBIO. I've gone through the edit history: the majority of edits were made by user:Widerberg and a group of IP editors who have made no edits to other articles, so I suspect there may be some COI editing going on here. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 18:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: I appreciate the research by Styyx and dom Kaos, and agree. My minor involvement with this page was when it first appeared. It over-wrote an already existing disambiguation page titled 'Widerberg', all of which was corrected. Xenxax (talk)
 * Delete I cannot find any sources, and I'm afraid no one else can because the subject is not notable, so no independent coverage exists. Keivan.f  Talk 06:27, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. and above, no independent coverage, no sign of notability. Alex-h (talk) 09:52, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Devoke water   (talk)  10:38, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment I was able to find more Turkish sources of Mixmag:, English sources:  , and an interview: . The subject has worked together Ian Urbina to produce this. Also unlike I said earlier, Mixmag is a reliable source. I'm still not sure if it should be kept, but he seems to not be that unnotable and might require further discussion.  ~Styyx   Talk? ^-^  13:03, 12 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.