Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wieslawa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 15:57, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Wieslawa
I can't really see why this warrants inclusion in an on this site - it was AfDed 2 years ago - result was no consensus David Humphreys SPEAK TO MEABOUTTHE THINGS I MESSED UP 08:23, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's a dicdef and an empty list. It's been 2 years, no one's got anything to add. --Core des at talk. o.o;; 09:11, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The nominator may also want to add Cinzia to the nomination. Kimchi.sg 10:41, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep both. They are not dicdef but articles on given names. All names common (and not so common) in English have articles, usually with a list of people called 'Steve'. If needed, request help on expanding from Italian and Polish Wiki editors. Nuttah68 14:16, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as dicdef. I'm not sure how else to identify two-sentence entries that state that a given word means such and such.  Tychocat 15:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - being a dicdef, this entry is currently not useful for Wikipedia. Punkmorten 20:57, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. This is not a dicdef, it is the etymology and root of a given name, as is Cinzia. It is no less notable than the articles on Andrew, Brian, Colin, David, Elizabeth........... Nuttah68 21:07, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Those other articles are disambiguation pages. (Except David, where we decided that the biblical King David gets the name with a see instead pointing at the disambiguation page.)  When we have two articles on someone named "Wieslawa", then we will need this as a disambiguation page.  Until then, we have no need for this.  As it currently has zero people with that name linked in, we don't need it now.GRBerry 02:12, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per GRBerry's reasoning (thank you!) Shenme 03:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.