Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wigger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. NW ( Talk ) 07:52, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Wigger

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

WP:NOT a dictionary. Toddst1 (talk) 00:22, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Maybe this should be moved to Wikitonary if its not already there.I'd say Delete and every article that links to wigger should be re linked to wikitonary. STAT -Verse 00:27, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a significant subject that can be covered encyclopedically. -Drdisque (talk) 02:57, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Fantastic, but is it within our policies? Toddst1 (talk) 03:58, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep. I'm willing to give the article a chance, but reliable sources need to be added soon. Otherwise, moving it to Wiktionary per STATic is the more prudent choice. Toad of Steel (talk) 06:46, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Either this article fits or we should choose to WP:IGNORE. Certainly all article titles are words or terms that have dictionary definitions.  The fact that the article already exhibits multiple sections (and exists not just as a single sentence) is evidence of the terms encyclopedic nature.  DRosenbach  ( Talk 20:50, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete α This is not a dictionary but this may have potential. But still it can be a flop. James1011R (talk) 23:59, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Offensive, but clearly notable, based on potential online sources. Keep. Bearian (talk) 21:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, though possibly rename. The concept is certainly notable; Ali G (the current page picture) is evidence of that. This article is also somewhat more than a dictionary definition. This may or may not be the best name for it, though. Robofish (talk) 02:22, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - an extremely notable subculture for which an encyclopedia article can (and should) be written, outside of a simple definition. Magog the Ogre (talk) 16:14, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.