Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wii Motor Sports


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete as uncertain future event. Can be recreated if a game is released, but there is no evidence, even the interview with the company, that a game by the same name or with the same game play will even be released. —Doug Bell talk 08:24, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Wii Motor Sports


This page is entirely composed of false/unverifiable information about a game that is not known to be planned, and was only shown at E3 2006 - one time. The name Wii Motor Sports was stated to only be temporary. The only game composing Wii Motor Sports is said to be this airplane game - but the airplane demo is nowhere to be seen. An old quote in the article taks about how it could be included in Wii Sports, but this has been contradicted since the released product contains no such ariplane demo. Scepia 07:54, 19 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Here's a crazy idea: instead of deleting it, edit it. In a addition, put one of them "upcoming events" templates at the top.--The4sword 16:34, 19 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep for now. TJ Spyke 23:59, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Please give justification for this. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. We can't have an article on August 12, 2016. Scepia 04:45, 29 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep or weak merge with Wii Sports. If we wait a while, we can get a little more information about it. if not, we can merge it with Wii Sports because it also part of the series...SuperSonic 16:05, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * This game, for all intents and purposes, does not exist. It is certainly not a part of Wii Sports - there is tennis, bowling, golf, etc., but the game is released and there is no airplane game in it. Scepia 04:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 20:14, 20 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete for now. When Reliable information is available, can always be recreated, but not acceptable now. Fan-1967 20:16, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete because Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. We don't pronounce on these types of things; we're not Wikinews. ➨  ЯEDVERS  21:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- Seehdjgee 22:14, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or Weak Merge The article may have potential, but Wikipedia is not a crystal ball may apply. Hello32020 22:31, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't it be deleted then? Scepia 04:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. -- moe.   RON   Let's talk  03:41, 21 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep and improve. It seems to have some verifiable information that we can use to make a good "upcoming" article. Andre (talk) 14:41, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Wikipedia is not a crystal ball Scepia 04:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep or Weak Merge per above. JQF 21:14, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. 1ne 00:29, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - come back when the games exist. Pete Fenelon 01:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. --Yarnalgo 18:34, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Nom. Denaar 13:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete it for now, remake it when there's some non-speculative info from a reputable source. Rampa geouS  21:22, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

I'd like to point out that the consensus was a total load of shit. The game is valid, it just needed to be fact checked. --Nintenfreak 19:28, 29 November 2006 (UTC)