Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiki-Surfing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 20:56, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Wiki-Surfing

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A neologism that should be more appropriate to Wiktionary than Wikipedia. The article is written more as a journal of the author's travels across the net searching for links to put in the article. CSD was originally denied, prod was removed by the author without comment. I left the article for a while to see if it would be improved by the author but it's just amassed more self-referential content. -- WebHamste r  14:30, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unverifiable original research that is non-notable, unencyclopediodic and badly written. If this were some well known activity then it might become notable-- Phoenix 15 14:58, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as a variation of that infamous game. Darksun 15:04, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete & salt as WP:MADEUP. I don't understand why people remove prod tags from content that doesn't stand a WP:SNOWBALL's chance of surviving. &lt;  el eland  //  talk  edits  &gt; 15:10, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete "Looks like i wasn't the first to coin this term". Maybe, just maybe, someone can wrap all of these into one article called wiki- so that people can have a dumping ground for this new word.  Wikiholic.  Wikiphobia.  Wikipotato.  Wikibasket.  I just thought up four words, just call me Shakespeare.  If only Gene Rayburn were alive, so that we could have some really good variations.  Mandsford 15:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete; neologisms aren't appropriate here. CRGreathouse (t | c) 16:41, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as an article without meaningful content. DGG (talk) 05:01, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Neologism with no reliable sources. -- Kl4m  T C 14:20, 25 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.