Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikiBrowse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was move to the Wikipedia: namespace. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 23:59, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

WikiBrowse
non notable softwares.--Xpwne 01:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, this is an active wikiproject. Note, the nominator has an edit history dedicated to the deletion of this and one other article - and nothing more.  --Dennisthe2 01:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep The reason given for deletion is not true. TSO1D 01:27, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Per above.  B e  a  rly  541  02:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to projectspace. This kind of thing does not belong in the mainspace. This application fails WP:SOFTWARE beyond question, so it should certainly not have an article. While I recognize it as an active WikiProject--it's just that, a WikiProject. WikiProjects do not have a place in the mainspace. Move it to WikiBrowse. AmiDaniel (talk) 02:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to WikiBrowse per AmiDaniel. -AMK152 02:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to WikiBrowse per AmiDaniel. Obvious. --Dhartung | Talk 02:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to project namespace. MER-C 03:08, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Move or Keep per all the above points. Sharkface217 04:35, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Move per AmiDaniel. &spades; P  M  C  &spades; 05:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete: Has the author of the software expressed an interest in maintaining the WikiProject page? I'll assume no for now, unless something changes my mind. If page is not maintained, I have a strong inkling that the page will go into disarray and disuse. A WikiProject needs members to keep it going. Do we have that right now? Until I see this, delete. Copysan 05:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per "no self-references". Zetawoof(&zeta;) 06:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'd go with "keep and clean up", for that. --Dennisthe2 08:38, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, that in combination with its being a non-notable project. I guess my point is that its being related to Wikipedia isn't a reason to keep it. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 10:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to project space as WikiBrowse, more suitable for project space. This is a WikiProject, therefore... Ter e nce Ong 13:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to project space WikiBrowse.-- John Lake 18:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Move per AmiDaniel and others. Kind Regards -  Heligoland  |   Talk  |   Contribs  19:27, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Move per AmiDaniel. Yes, it is rather obvious. ~ Ed Boy [p]\[m]/[c] 21:50, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Move per AmiDaniel and everyone else.  Hagerman ( talk ) 00:57, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Move to Project: namespace, delete redirect. Not notable enough as an article topic, I guess, but it's a prime candidate for material that's perfectly all right for Project: space. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 14:53, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.