Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikiFood.eu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  12:07, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

WikiFood.eu

 * – ( View AfD View log )

2011 NC at Articles for deletion/Wikifood that probably should have been a soft deletion as even the merge vote didn't seem to believe there was sourcing. Per its organizer, it won a couple of awards, but there's no indication these are notable, and there's no English or German sourcing to meet GNG. German article doesn't h ave anything of help as it & the Englist have the same sourcing. No article for Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology and no indication this was anything more than one of their projects so might be UNDUE there. Star  Mississippi  00:28, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  00:28, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  00:28, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Luxembourg-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  00:28, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom. Poorly-referenced article for non-notable website. Waddles 🗩 🖉 00:43, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 12:56, 30 August 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:51, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete – my searches aren't finding any coverage that would satisfy WP:NWEB/the GNG. (GScholar gets a few hits, but these are mostly primary-source descriptions of various studies involving the site.) And contra the !vote in the previous AfD, there seems to be no possible target for merging (or redirecting). Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:18, 7 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.