Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikiMegaman Timeline


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was SPEEDILY DELETED. By creator request, and more or less incomprehensible to boot. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 08:08, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

WikiMegaman Timeline
I don't even know where to begin here. The title of the page almost makes my case for me. It's full of fancruft and speculation and by the very nature of the game series itself, would be difficult to salvage even after a rename. Danny Lilithborne 04:51, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Hey Danny,ever read this:  I just joined only about an hour or two ago,and like I usually do on sites I just join,I forget to read the rules.I also have a reason for the title crap,whenever I searched under the name of "Megaman Timeline" I got timeline for X3,and BN5,and Classic Megaman 8 yadda yadda.I had also just learned that how to make new topics because the searchword I looked up didn't have any article in Wiki.So I had to put WikiMegaman Timeline.I admit from only skimming I know a screwed up from what I know at least once.And it is not fancruft!Thats not even a word in the dictionary!Maaayybe speculation but not fancruft.I'm just stating the facts of the timeline by using the dates to organize it.And another thing captain noob biter,I freaking misunderstood the declaration of a discussion in your deletion policy and erased all of the Proposed to be deleted stuff.I did not intent to make this this worse,like I said I am a N00B.GET IT?

Mega-Soul.exe 05:09, 25 June 2006 (UTC)Mega-Soul.exe
 * Comment Biting the newbies has got nothing to do with where a newbie creates a waste of space and needs to be shown the folly of its ways. Please familiarise yourself with the appropriate policies such as WP:NOT before posting things or creating pages. Jammo (SM247) 05:39, 25 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete Comprehensively incomprehensible. Nonsense. Jammo (SM247) 05:39, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Oh just shove off.The timeline facts are right,there's no other explanation for the X's being there than if they were variables!Thus meaning it's true! Mega-Soul.exe 05:47, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * delete per nom. M1ss1ontom a rs2k4 (T 05:50, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Aww forget it and delete the shit and get it over with Mega-Soul.exe 05:54, 25 June 2006 (UTC)Mega-Soul.exe
 * Speedy Delete as requested by article author Nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure. Bwithh 06:21, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.