Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikiProject Islam:The Muslim Guild

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus. --malathion talk 06:03, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Islam:The Muslim Guild
POV magnet, created by editors pretending to be Muslim, so as to act as a strawman-opponent to their real point of view.


 * Delete     ( ! | ? | * ) 14:43, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think you are the first editor that has ever accused the creator of this project, Striver, of just pretending to be a Muslim. -- Karl Meier 22:05, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
 * It's clearer with Saduj al-Dahij     ( ! | ? | * ) 23:20, 6 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep Insh Allah. -- Darwinek 08:06, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep lol :) -striver
 * Keep, but the constitution should be NPOV, like the constitution of SIIEG. Otherwise DELETE. --Germen (Talk | Contribs Netherlands flag small.svg) 16:19, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless they change the guidlines to allow all people interested in Islam to join, not just people with a single POV. --Quasipalm 16:31, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Where does it say that you need to have a pov to be allwode to enter? --Striver 04:22, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neutralitytalk 17:19, August 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete completely against the spirit of Wikipedia. Take it to meta.  Grue   19:50, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, completely against ethos of Wikipedia Proto t c 10:34, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, cleanup the "constitution" for neutrality. mikka (t) 22:17, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. &mdash;Dv 10:00:56, 2005-08-09 (UTC)
 * Delete For the same reasons as other sub wikiProject Islam guilds. __earth 17:09, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as User:Quasipalm, I feel this is a good idea only if non-Muslims should be able to join. That appears to be the case at the moment.  Hence, keep. ObsidianOrder 11:12, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep WiseSabre 20:35, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
 * KeepHeraclius 22:15, 12 August 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.