Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikiTaxi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:24, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

WikiTaxi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Little press coverage and such; most information on WT is on blogs, the creator's site, and unreliable sources. No indication that the subject meets WP:NWEB.  HurricaneFan 25  —  16:47, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep or Move I don't see any reason to delete this,or move to Wikipedia:Wikitaxi.Night Of Darkness 16:49, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * What makes this any different from any other Wikipedia-reading application?  HurricaneFan 25  —  16:51, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes,difference is there.Example- Twinkle, a automated software to edit Wikipedia.WikiTaxi- The Whole Wikipedia collected in a software to view offline.Night Of Darkness 16:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

*Weak keep Although only sourced from from one primary source, and a handful of secondary sources, they appear to verify the content of the article&mdash;which is little more than that fact this piece of software exists. As for notability, I think its tenuous, but the fact that it has been featured in three different websites shows sufficient to survive deletion IMO. I have cleared up the article and removed some superfluous information. Pol430 talk to me 11:42, 30 December 2011 (UTC)  Pol430  talk to me 12:03, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete When I made the comments above it was based on my impression that the sources were editorials, not blogs. On closer inspection they do indeed appear to be blogs. Therefore unreliable sources, so I move my position to delete. Pol430  talk to me 12:03, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per Pol430. Bruvtakesover (T&#124;C) 12:05, 31 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Issue solved.4 out of 5 references are not Blogs.Night Of Darkness 05:07, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Poorly sourced (blog, download site, Q&A site, etc), no coverage in mainstream press to establish notability of this software. Dialectric (talk) 03:21, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.