Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikiTimeScale (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 21:37, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

WikiTimeScale
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable MediaWiki extension/defunct website. LiteralKa (talk) 19:03, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: Does changing the link to this solve the defunct website issue? This is another site by the same developer and even the logo says WikiTimeScale. huji— TALK 19:42, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:27, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

. I think huji's proposal is a good one. Alternatively, this article can be redirected to WikiTimeLine with a reference to Extension:WikiTimeLine in MediaWiki. FakhredinBlog (talk) 11:52, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment—The above proposals are irrelevant, since the website is not the central issue. As with the previous AfD nomination, the concern is notability. Meph talk 15:40, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   Wifione    .......  Leave a message  06:10, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete – insufficient coverage (one mention in a RS) to be considered notable. --Lambiam 00:46, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete—Dead non-notable website. Google hits appear to be principally the Wiki itself or a Sourceforge subpage. It's difficult to verify or find significant coverage, so it fails WP:GNG. Meph talk 03:55, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment—It was previously deleted as non-notable. Meph talk 03:57, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.