Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiki (rapper)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure). ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 21:36, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Wiki (rapper)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not really any notability, not many reliable sources, seems like a c-grade celebrity. A few of his raps seem to hit 200k views at youtube, but i dont think this is significant enough. Apples&#38;Manzanas (talk) 21:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn by nominator. For reasons mentioned below. Apples&#38;Manzanas (talk) 01:31, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:20, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:20, 3 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Correction: i found some raps of his with over 600k views on youtube. But i still dont think this is notable enough. There isn't much evidence of him being notable. Whilst he does have one article about him from the new york times LINK. It seemed like pretty minor coverage, unless we want to open the floodgates to every minor celebrity getting a wikipedia page the moment they get an article. Apples&#38;Manzanas (talk) 21:27, 3 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Further comment: Also, beyond the discussion about notability, it's worth noting that the majority of the article is just his discography and that material isn't even given citations. So the article arguably has sourcing problems too. Apples&#38;Manzanas (talk) 00:50, 4 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment - This rapper also has several album articles, which will become untenable if his artist page is deleted. Those album articles could possibly be combined into this AfD. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 15:16, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Very obviously notable given just a quick Google search. As well as being a member of a clearly notable group, there is plenty of coverage of him outside the group, e.g., , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . --Michig (talk) 19:02, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per and the many excellent sources found. Bearian (talk) 19:14, 6 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.