Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiki Battle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete, WP:NFT, The Game again. NawlinWiki 21:54, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Wiki Battle

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete as nom. The article clearly fails WP:NFT, and had the prod tags remove. Flyguy649 20:42, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The article has been edited, but an edit relevant to WP:NFT is here Flyguy649 20:49, 22 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom Jules1975 20:52, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This was probably copied from an essay on Wikipedia, wherever that is. WP:NFT this out. Sr13 (T|C) Editor review 20:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Its Six degrees of Wikipedia in a new, shiny form. No information is taken from reliable, thrid party sources - "References (All by Personal Interviews)". No external sources that can be checked by others at all. Nothing here at this point can be WP:attributed, and I'd be willing to claim without searching that this term is unverifable. Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day applies, in particular Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. Delete -- saberwyn 21:02, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. This wheel that gets re-invented about once a week! -- RHaworth 21:04, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't think speedy delete applies here. But maybe it should! The tag could be or some such... Flyguy649 21:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per Saberwyn and per WP:V. Barno 21:09, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete If I had known about WP:NFT I would have put it up for speedy deletion. --Afed 21:46, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per the article having no attribution, as well as possibly being made up. Kyra~(talk) 23:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Wikidelete Wikijunk. JuJube 01:42, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.