Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiki addict

Wiki addict
Maybe this should be deleted? I made the article myself...not the best way to cure. What do you think? Should we keep it and start our own clinic or should it be deleted? regards, --georingo 20:01, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * my vote: a strong keep ! --georingo 20:04, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete or move to your own User space. RickK 20:36, Oct 2, 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Are You a Wikipediholic Test.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 21:38, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, or at least move to Wikipedia namepace. Anything but keep. Wyllium 00:29, 2004 Oct 3 (UTC)
 * Georingo, this article you've written is perfect for the Meta-wiki &mdash; why don't you copy it there before it's deleted here? The Meta-wiki is, among other things, a place to get all philosophical about the wiki phenomenon (see m:Category:Patterns). Who knows, there might be some possible cures there. :-) Anyway, you were right to list Wiki addict for deletion; it's not an encyclopedia article. My vote is delete. &bull; Benc &bull; 08:08, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. --*drew 08:10, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * I agree with Gwalla and say Redirect to Are You a Wikipediholic Test
 * Move somewhat amusing content to georingo's user space and redirect the title to Are You a Wikipediholic Test. Fire Star 20:26, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * No value in having even a redirect in the main space. A move to meta space or user space is fine by me. -- Jmabel 00:53, Oct 6, 2004 (UTC)
 * Move to Wikipedia: namespace or Wiki addict. &#8212;No-One Jones (m) 00:55, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Does not belong in main namespace even as redirect. Move to meta or elsewhere. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 01:45, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete: The best way to cure it is to write a policy proposal.  Geogre 02:18, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)