Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikicodia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete &mdash; Caknuck 00:52, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikicodia

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable wiki. No sources, none found via searching (no google hits). Delete. Wickethewok 02:29, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Super-strong delete, only GHits are for the Wikicodia site itself. One of the least notable wikis it seems. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 02:32, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Ditto the super-strong - Generally, "How to contact us" sections = a majorly promotional article. No claims to notability, no independent sources, no context to begin with... this article violates so many deletion policies it can probably be speedied. Hersfold (talk/work) 03:10, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletions.   -- the wub  "?!"  13:18, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above and per nom.  Wikidudeman  (talk) 15:21, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * speedy delete spam for non-notable web site. -Steve Sanbeg 19:11, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete a SourceForge clone with all the code in the Wiki instead of CVS or SVN? 132.205.44.5 19:25, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment How does this make it worthy for deletion? -- Jimmi Hugh 15:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No Google Hits, Completely unknown and written like an advert, even with contact information on page. -- Jimmi Hugh 15:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.