Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikidemia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCDe ✉ 16:35, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Wikidemia
Appears to be original research; page is written as an essay, and the term gets 350 google hits so sounds hardly like a scientific topic. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 22:39, 26 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Well, I don't want to say the article is good or anything, but I think the topic could be of intrinsic interest to wikipedia users and to more people as wiki software comes more in use, so I am (tentatively) for keep. Ben T/C 23:08, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Runa27
 * Delete per nom as OR. --Muchness 23:10, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Nacon Kantari  e |t||c|m 23:33, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:56, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's a stub, and it does seem worded like an essay, but I think it was OK. Also, the fact that the term turns up several hundred results on Google implies that it's starting to become more popular in usage. Though I'm not sure if this might count as more of a Wiktionary-appropriate entry than a Wikipedia-appropriate entry.
 * Delete it's in the wrong namespace, and already exists (Wikidemia) in the right namespace. Ziggurat 23:20, 30 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.