Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikidiction


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0 [ talk ] 16:29, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikidiction
Neologism Endomion 20:22, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - true but as nom says: Neologism. -Localzuk (talk) 20:34, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * All commenting here have this, but the right thing is to Delete this NeoL. Obina 21:07, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this doesn't belong in mainspace. It belongs in Wikipedia space; in fact it's already there as Wikipediholic. Segv11 (talk/contribs) 21:40, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable unverifiable unstable neologism, i.e. protologism. Wikinaut was funnier :).  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-13 21:48Z 
 * Delete or Merge with WP:HOLIC WAvegetarian (talk) (email)   (contribs) 21:51, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't like the merge, because that would leave a suprious cross-namspace redirect. (Yes, I know the WP:xxx shortcuts are techincally redirects from mainspace to Wikipedia: space, but that's because we're using WP: as a pseudo-namespace...) Segv11 (talk/contribs) 02:23, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Besides, I always thought wiki-diction was how well one articulates oneself on Wikipedia... -- Krash 17:48, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * We already have an equal or better article in Wikipedia: space which is where this belongs, so delete per Segv11. Stifle 01:09, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn neologism Incognito 05:21, 17 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.