Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikiknowledge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was delete. Proto :: type  11:48, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Wikiknowledge
A wiki with 900 articles, no Alexa ranking and its (redlinked in article space) creator as the last editor. No evidence of meeting WP:WEB or any other criteria for inclusion. WP:NOT a web directory. Just zis Guy you know? 15:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC) style="color: rgb(255, 10, 0);"> Humphreys SPEAK TO MEABOUTTHE THINGS I MESSED UP 23:33, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as advertisement. -- Emc² ( CONTACT ME ) 15:32, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Emc² ''
 * Keep The website is small now but it has the potential to be big. Pseudoanonymous 18:16, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. When it grows big, it can be rewritten. -Seidenstud 20:03, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Although I am grateful to Pseudoanonymous for creating an article about my website, it would probably be more helpful if people contributed to my public domain wiki more. That way it could become bigger, faster. Gerard Foley 22:57, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:WEB -- Steel 23:00, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:WEB and WP:ADS David <span
 * Delete per nom. When the potential becomes reality, let us know. --DaveG12345 03:39, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep unless the relevance of every wikipedia page from List of wikis is to be questioned- also seems like it might be a more friendly place for things that get challenged as "game guides" here - WP:NOT can make WP:NOT a nice place to edit. Ace of Risk 17:35, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Chaser T 06:42, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Zoz (t) 13:52, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Is there somewhere that List of wikis can go, maybe on the meta server. Hardly any of the wikis on that page deserve articles. They seem highly like self-references to me. Ans e ll  06:23, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.