Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikilaw


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mon francais, c'est tres mauvais, mais j'a compri le message du User:DV8 2XL en "delete". &mdash; J I P | Talk 19:01, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

Wikilaw
This website isn't notable enought to have an a article in an encyclopedia. A Google search with phrase Wikilaw -"wikipedia" (to avoid Wikipedia copies) produces no results showing notability, like a special page in MeatBall wiki or discussion about it somewhere. Almost all internal links in Wikilaw front page are green, which means that no-one has written about them yet. No-one has edited the website during the last 30 days. Many wiki special pages don't work, so I couldn't get the list of registered members or all pages. So no-one is even actively maintaining the website. -Hapsiainen 20:38, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per myself. -Hapsiainen 20:38, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- howcheng  [ talk &#149; contribs &#149; web ] 22:29, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Effacement un projet personel d'utilisateur Rjolly DV8 2XL 22:38, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are billions of moribund websites and although this article is strictly factual, it is content-free. -Splash talk 00:30, 19 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.