Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikileaks and pakistan politicians


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:41, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Wikileaks and pakistan politicians

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This just reproduces parts of the cables relevant to Pakistan. I think a rough consensus has emerged that they should not be used in such a way at Requests for comment/Use of classified documents and therefore this should be deleted. Yoenit (talk) 08:20, 21 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete We had a similar article titled "Indian Wikileaks" which did the same thing for India and it's pertaining leaks. That article was CSD'd, and I see no reason why this should not either - Amog  | Talk •  contribs 10:39, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I dunno under which criteria I should do so, non seems applicable. Yoenit (talk) 12:11, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, that other article went under WP:A10 - Amog  | Talk •  contribs 12:48, 23 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. Noteworthy, significant, and widely covered in many WP:RS secondary sources. -- Cirt (talk) 18:27, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Article is entirely reliant on primary sources. Nick-D (talk) 10:52, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Probably should delete this since it's just copy and pasted source material. But before it goes it'd be worthwhile to see if the information contained in these sources can be mentioned on the articles covering the politicians in question, a lot of it seems pertinent. Bryan Derksen (talk) 03:54, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as copy-paste. If necessary, add any relevant information into articles about persons mentioned in this article. Beagel (talk) 11:44, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.