Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. April fools nom (non-admin closure) Breawycker (talk to me!) 01:46, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Obviously useless. Fails every notability guideline imaginable. Find more important stuff to do, like file a complaint against an experienced editor at WP:ANNIE and get indeffed within 10 seconds.-- SkyGazer 512 My talk page 00:06, 1 April 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: because we can't let non-admins have a monopoly on relisting ansh 666 20:00, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Nuke and send to Uranus as that is the only sensible option. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 00:37, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Wrong venue 58.119.3.26 (talk) 04:54, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete this and consider removing Category: Proposed Deletion while we're at it. Gimubrc (talk) 13:26, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ansh 666 20:00, 1 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.