Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Dr. Wooday P Krishna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 23:23, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Dr. Wooday P Krishna

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is constructed exclusively out of primary sources, whereas we need in-depth stories in credible, independent sources to source content from in order to create a proper Wikipedia page. It is unlikely enough has been written about him by academics or press to create a substantive work. CorporateM (Talk) 06:47, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have moved the article out of WP-space to Wooday P. Krishna. That said, an admin may want to check this page as a potential G4 candidate per Articles for deletion/Dr. Wooday P Krishna.  08:27, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  14:48, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  14:49, 19 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep -Okay, Subject may meet WP:BIO and WP:GNG standard -here are the sources about them, -,, , , , , , , , , . See also, press-clippings on their official website -it is in four pages, 1, 2, 3, 4 -see here last two. The article however in its present shape reads kinda WP:PROMO and one requires to do copy-edit a lot or simply re-write it from a new end using these sources. And before you say "passing mentions" thing in reply to this post, please -see here the last two.  Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  20:12, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Removed promo stuffs. I may re-write the article in few hours. Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  20:20, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I started looking at the sources above, but they were all just articles in which he was quoted in, as oppose to biographical pieces. Didn't really seem to pass muster IMO. CorporateM (Talk) 22:25, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Just finished renovating the article. I think, last three coverage in here combined with all passing and short coverage make him eligible for inclusion. You may want to see now-version of the article. Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  23:12, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn: Per User:Anupmehra. CorporateM (Talk) 23:16, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.